Article first published as Book Review: The Man Who Smiled by Henning Mankell on Blogcritics.

The Man Who Smiled (Mannen som log) is the fourth instalment in Henning Mankell’s highly acclaimed Kurt Wallander series. The plot revolves around three murders and the figure of Alfred Harderberg, one of the richest men in Sweden.

Chronologically the book is set between October and December 1993, it picks up one year after the events narrated in the third novel in the series (The White Lioness). In the early pages of the book we learn that the lawyer Gustaf Torstensson is killed for he has found out too many secrets about the origins of the wealth and power of his only client Alfred Harderberg. The Swedish author writes this chapter from the point of view of Mr. Torstensson and this expedient gives to the reader a crucial insight about the story. It also gives us an advantage of many pages on Wallander and his team with regard to the investigation. When we finally meet Inspector Wallander, at the beginning of the second chapter, he is strolling on the sandy beaches of Skagen, in the north of Denmark. We learn that Wallander has been on sick leave for over a year, after he killed a man while on duty. Burdened by the sense of guilt, Wallander has come to question his future as a police officer. After 25 years in the force, he is ready to resign and start a new life. This is what he tells Sten Torstensson, a good friend of his and the son of the dead lawyer, who has come to Skagen to ask for Wallander’s help in solving his father’s murder. The police has archived the death as a car accident, but Sten is convinced otherwise. Wallander however can do nothing for Sten, he already considers himself an ex-police officer. A week later Wallander is back in Ystad. He has to sign some paperwork, say good-bye to his former colleagues and officially retire. He is ready for it, but then something happens and it changes everything. Continue reading »

Share
 

BUY IT FROM: Amazon.co.ukAmazon.comThe Book Depository

The Dogs of Riga, by Henning MankellOn a winter snowy day, a life-raft is washed up on the shore of the small Swedish town of Ystad. Two dead bodies with bullet-holes in their chests are found inside the raft. From the start it looks like one of those cases that promise nothing but a severe headache for the police officer that deals with it. Inspector Kurt Wallander is called in to investigate the murders. The post-mortem indicates that the two bodies might be Russian or at least from one of the Baltic States. The year is 1991, a time of political turmoil in the former Soviet bloc, Russia is on the brink of a coup d’état and the Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) are all pressing for independence. Major Karlis Liepa, an officer of the Riga’s police department, is sent to Ystad to work with Wallander on identifying the two bodies. The same day he returns to Riga, Major Liepa is murdered, soon after Wallander is summoned there to help with the investigation. This is what happens in the first part of Henning Mankell’s the Dogs of Riga. The remain of the book deals with Wallander’s attempt to solve the murder of Major Liepa.

The Dogs of Riga is the first book I have ever read from the nine written by Henning Mankell’s for his acclaimed detective series featuring Kurt Wallander. I found it in a second-hand bookshop in Highgate Village, London. I was alraedy familiar with the characters in the story (at least the ones appearing in the first part, that is in Ystad), as I had recently watched the six episodes of the BBC series based on Mankell’s books. In the TV show, Wallander is played excellently by Kenneth Branagh. After watching those shows, I was so intrigued by  Mankell’s creation that I promised myself to read some of his Wallander’s books as soon as I had a chance. So when I came across The Dogs of Riga and read the first pages, I decided to buy and read it.

Let me say it straightaway: it is nor the best crime fiction you will ever read, and I guess  it’s neither the best in Wallander’s series, but by no means it is a waste of time. The strength of the book is beyond doubt its main lead character, Wallander himself, its greatest weakness, unfortunately, is Mankell’s plot. Continue reading »

Share
 

BUY IT FROM: Amazon.co.ukAmazon.comThe Book Depository

Enter the world of Jane Charlotte, a mid-thirty washed-up girl from California who is locked up in a white room, in the “nut wing” of Las Vegas’ Clark County Detention Center. She is sitting handcuffed at a table. “A man in a white coat”, Dr. Richard Vale is interviewing her. It’s June 5th, 2002, post 9/11 America. Jane, apparently, killed someone. Someone, she says, she was not supposed to kill. If that was not bad enough, when the police arrested her, she confessed that she works for

Bad Monkeys by Matt Ruff

“The Department for the Final Disposition of Irredeemable Persons”, or, for short, the “Bad Monkeys”. The Bad Monkeys is a division of a secret organization devoted to fight evil. In other words, Jane kills people who do Evil not as a mean to a particular end (i.e. money, power); but because they are, simply, evil. Mostly, these are paedophiles, rapists, and psycho killers.

Dr. Vale is trying to find out whether or not she is crazy, and so are we, the readers of Matt Ruff’s fourth novel Bad Monkeys. Will Dr. Vale succeed in his task? Will we succeed? At the end of the book, albeit quite disappointed by the rushed-off ending that throws in one more, probably unnecessary, plot-twist, I found myself thinking: does it really matter? Maybe not. The ride was fun, that is all that matters when you read a book like this.

Throughout the book we follow Jane’s recount of how she ended up in Vegas: she starts from her first meeting with the Organization – when she was 14 and was instructed to kill a janitor (who had a penchant for kidnapping, raping and killing little boys). She kills him with a NC Gun, an orange look-alike-toy-gun that kills people by causing them to die of natural causes, i.e. by cardiac arrest. 200 pages or so later we end up in Sin City. Meanwhile 23 years have passed. Jane’s hectic, fuzzy and often hilarious style brings us through a maze of impossible twists (far too many I must add), improbable characters, and far-fetched conspiracy theories. We meet serial killers, scary clowns, ants farm, flying Axes, and psychos that take super secret drugs that allow them to disappear and fly. Her story is often inconsistent with the reality of the historical facts, or rather implausible, as Dr. Vale points out here and there. Jane shudders the discrepancies off for they are (often) proof of the Organization’s power to alter the facts. Continue reading »

Share
© 2012 On Books, Movies and Other Stuff Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha